Greatest Kılavuzu C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Temel Özellikleri için

Greatest Kılavuzu C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Temel Özellikleri için

Blog Article

But yeah, I would have to agree that there's definitely a "hole" in the BCL where a read-only indexed collection interface should go. IList is just too multi-purpose.

read this question and don't want to read swathes of API docs yet still understand what the intent is. It's also really important to minimize code clutter - so things like ReadOnlyCollection are dubious at best.

-ArrayList: Dizinin benzeridir fakat yalnızca object tipinden verileri saklar. Nedeniyle da gönderilen veri object bileğilse boxing işçiliklemine yayımcı tutulur.

Note that I split the interface into IReadOnlyMyItem and IWritableMyItem but you don't actually need IWritableMyItem - you could just omit that interface and write:

Summary. The ReadOnlyCollection functions as a wrapper for any collection that implements IList. It adds a level of indirection that reduces possible changes.

Anyway, I believe that a domain object should be read-write, because at the end of the day, a domain object describes an entity within the domain and you should be able to access and modify it.

If your only intent is to get calling code to C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nasıl Kullanılır derece make a mistake, and modify the collection when it should only be reading all that is necessary is to return an interface which doesn't support Add, Remove, etc.

An immutable object is defined bey an object that cannot be changed after it özgü been created. Hamiş all collections are immutable, but you güç use C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Kullanımı the read-only collection types in .

Any idea why IList doesn't inherit from ICollection? Since the latter is basically IEnumerable plus Count, and since C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nerelerde Kullanılıyor IList already özgü a Count method, having IList inherit ICollection wouldn't have required any more work for implementers, but would have allowed someone with an IList to know how many items C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Temel Özellikleri to expect from an enumeration.

Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.

Nothing wrong with wordy types for major API's with small surfaces, but derece as a general practice inside a C# ReadOnlyCollectionBase Nedir large codebase.

C# Metot münasebet kullanılır? C# Metotlar, bir yetişek ortamında yeniden yeniden kullanılması müstelzim kod bloklarını gruplandırmak ve elan sonra giymek muhtevain kullanılır. Facebook Twitter Whatsapp Tumbler Pinterest

I was looking for a similar solution, but I wanted to still be able to modify the collection from inside the class so I chose the option outlined here: In short, his example is: public class MyClass

This causes unnecessary boxing/unboxing of value types. One of the benefits of using generics is the avoidance of such boxing/unboxing which could have a detremintal effect on the performance of the collections.